Legal plunder

Da const.


<Index>

<prev> <next>

<Legal spoliation>

<Social conflict glossary>

Legal dispossession is writing rules while playing. M.P.R. </ Small>

The 'legal spoliation' consists in the appropriation by elite of the legal spoliation of prey assets and the rights of the majority generally ignorant of their constitutional rights, with the instrumental use of the 'ordering, through illegitimate rules, that is, that do not respect the Constitution.

Legal dispossession, for these characteristics, is a legal activity, and therefore fully documented and can be reconstructed at any time.

It is substantiated with a law written for the benefit of a small group, along the lines of the ancient privileges (from the Latin law for the individual).

While the motto "The law is equal for all (in the application of justice)" stands out in the courts, in reality the laws are different for the mass of induced imbeciles compared to the restricted elite of power.

In these cases the law is seen to be a voluntary discipline.

Legal dispossession is substantiated with the funding, legal but not legitimate, of a elite of power by the plundered induced imbeciles.

While the term 'spoliation' indicates an arbitrary subtraction carried out with violence or with the deception of the goods of others, the 'legal spoliation' concerns an appropriation of the goods of others that takes place in a legal and therefore organized way but always with deception, sophistry, fallacies in that it operates illegally constitutionally, that is, with laws that violate the Constitution.

The Legal spoliation laws are enacted in a very limited number compared to the whole system but have a devastating economic impact for the realization of the legal social segmentation.

With the 'legal dispossession' the power groups, even in the presence of violations of the Constitution, take possession of the heritage prey, without any sanction either of a civil or criminal nature as the laws have a function of indemnification towards the administrators of this patrimony both of the entities that appropriate it.

The 'legal dispossession' is the application to the contrary of the second paragraph of the Art. 3 of the Constitution It is the task of the Republic to remove obstacles of an economic and social order, which, by effectively limiting the freedom and equality of citizens, prevent the full development of the human person and the effective participation of all workers to the political, economic and social organization of the country.

Legal dispossession consists in the implementation of laws that legalize economic and social obstacles that in fact limit the freedom and equality of citizens, prevent the full development of the human person and the effective participation of all workers in the political organization economic and social situation. [1] [2]

Legal dispossession is confirmation of the existence, in the face of constitutional problems, of two groups of men: those who believe in the Constitutions and those who do not believe in the Constitutions.

For those who do not believe in the Constitutions, that is, that on the day they conquer the majority, they behave as they wish, [3] legal dispossession represents the goal of their belief as they demonstrate that the first part of the Constitution, of programmatic content, not only remains a dead letter, but is applied in reverse.


The power system that binds the Mafia, Freemasonry and politics in Italy is based on the implementation of legal dispossession.

The highlight of the legal spoliation is the illegitimate electoral law and the vote of the exponents of the massomafioso power system in the new political formations that are proposed as an anti-system.

"Change everything to not change anything".

Cases of subtraction of assets[modifica | modifica sorgente]

An individual may be obliged to transfer part of his assets, either directly or indirectly as a citizen through public bodies, for one of the following cases:


Legal dispossession and political regime[modifica | modifica sorgente]

N Description Right Legal Constitutional dispossession Examples / Effects Type well Beneficiaries Political regime
1 Illegal spoliation Private law No Yes theft, scam, robbery Individual good ladro democracy, dictatorship
2 Illegal spoliation Public law No Yes corruption, concussion, theft , scam Common goods mafia, masonry, ladro democracy, dictatorship
3 Illegal spoliation Public law No Yes excess of power (symptomatic figure) Individual good institution democracy, dictatorship
4 Bond Private law Yes No Fee compravendita, work contract, compensation for damages Individual good buyer / seller democracy, dictatorship
5 Bond Public law Yes No tax, tributi Common goods citizen democracy, dictatorship
6 Legal spoliation Public law Yes Yes Finance drift, Suicidal economic policies, Subtraction through prey assets, illegitimate taxes, denied public services, discrimination, tax expenditure Heritage prey Interest group Democratic fascism

Legal dispossession and market[modifica | modifica sorgente]

- N Description Right Legal Constitutional dispossession Examples / Effects Type well Market Bargaining - 1 Illegal spoliation Private law No Yes theft, scam, robbery Individual good No No - 2 Illegal spoliation Public law No Yes corruption, concussion, theft , scam Common goods No No - 3 Illegal spoliation Public law No Yes excess of power (symptomatic figure) Individual good No No - 4 Bond Private law Yes No Fee compravendita, work contract, compensation for damages Individual good Free competition Yes - 5 Bond Public law Yes No tax, tributi Common goods Monopoly No - 6 Legal spoliation Public law Yes Yes Finance drift, Suicide economic policies, Subtraction through prey assets, illegitimate taxes, denied public services, discrimination, tax expenditure Heritage prey Monopoly No

Legal spoliation and jurisdiction[modifica | modifica sorgente]

In order to defend yourself from the stealing of assets in various cases, you must act at the legal institution indicated in the table

- N Description Right Legal Constitutional dispossession Examples / Effects Like well Giuristizione - 1 Illegal spoliation Private law No Yes theft, scam, robbery Individual good court - 2 Illegal spoliation Public law No Yes corruption, concussion, theft , scam] Common goods court - 3 Illegal spoliation Public law No Yes excess of power (symptomatic figure) Individual good Administrative court - 4 Bond Private law Yes No Fee compravendita, work contract, compensation for damages Individual good court - 5 Bond Public law Yes No tax, tributi Common goods court - 6 Legal spoliation Public law Yes Yes Abuse of law, Finance drift, Suicidal economic policies, Subtraction through prey assets, illegitimate taxes, denied public services , discrimination, tax expenditure Heritage prey Constitutional Court

Pinocchio victim of legal dispossession[modifica | modifica sorgente]

Wanting to summarize the concept of legal dispossession, I am reminded of the fable of Pinocchio and its relations with the Cat and the Fox.

Legal dispossession is the methodical application, through the laws, of the fable of Gatto e la Volpe where the Pinocchio on duty (defined as looted induced imbeciles) they are obliged to bury the gold sequins (prey heritage) in the Campo dei Miracoli (to deposit their property in a legal institution by law) where, thanks to the miraculous properties of the place (lack of education financial), they will undergo a multiplication (with the construction of the truth, disinformation, information asymmetry this is believed), but upon awakening Pinocchio finds that the Cat and the Fox they stole everything (lack of ethics of the elites who take ownership of the property thanks to the laws of legal dispossession).

At the basis of the legal dispossession there is therefore the ignoranza of the majority who is therefore looted.

The most incomprehensible passage of the elites of power, for the looted, is the logic of betrayal that occurs when the Cat and the Fox on duty tell the falsehoods knowing the inferiority of the Pinocchio child (information asymmetry, illiteracy financial). This is because the betrayal is consumed scientifically, studying the laws at the table and making them approved at legislative assemblies. How do you imagine that Parliament, which is the maximum expression of legality, approves laws that apply legal spoliation? Where is the ethics of the elite?

This happens on the push of the gold sequins (longing for money that nullifies any inhibitory brake of the elite).

Recall that in the legal spoliation, the fable is written in the laws, knowingly violating the programmatic part of the Italian Constitution, trusting in the [[Italian unconstitutional constitution | almost impossible to have the unconstitutional law that is always the basis of the legal spoliation] cassated] and acts in parallel to a hedging purpose (which does not exist in the story) which concerns social rights, public interests, thus masking the ethical violation of the elite.

Lobbying on parliament, the press, the university, institutions, financial institutions cannot, in the most striking cases of legal dispossession, have an association like masonry behind it.

Only the thrust of Freemasonry, for the organization, the history, the economic power that coordinates, can hypothesize, organize and manage these legal spoliation mechanisms. What would be the ethics that guide freemasonry?

This explains why, even if advertising only cultural and philanthropic interests, Freemasonry is forced to operate in secret: if the links between the members were known, the entire chain of relationships related to legal spoliation would be highlighted.

In Italy, therefore, talking about masonry and legal spoliation is the same thing.

But legal spoliation could not exist if there were no widespread ignorance of almost all Italians in the legal matters subject to legal spoliation. And it is not a question of knowing who knows what abstruse formulas, but only the basics of the Constitution and the notions of public finance.

Mass ignorance is a consequence of public school.

The technique of legal dispossession described below should be the subject of a course or at least a university master's degree in "current unconstitutional law".

The non-existence of this matter, based on the hundreds of judgments of the Constitutional Court on the unconstitutionality of the laws laid down by Parliament, otherwise raises serious doubts about the preparation that is obtained from Italian universities.

Vice versa, the recognition of the existence of legal dispossession and therefore of the "current unconstitutional law" would be nothing more than a recognition of a legally carried out activity.

As for the code of ethics, sanctions have never been applied to a lawyer who voted for the approval of an unconstitutional law.

Finally, with the official recognition of the technique of legal dispossession, the university masters on the financial management of the pension funds of freelancers, could get out of the hypocrisy of the definition of Italian social security in "mandatory" and "complementary" and start using the terms used all over the world i.e. to distinguish in public pension systems and private pension systems, state pension and private pension, welfare or social security, social contract and taxes, for State interventions and private pension, insurance contract, premium for pension funds.

All this when still today, these university masters, for those enrolled in public social security, teach "customer satisfaction", showing that in Italy the economics faculties do not know the difference between user and customer.

On the other hand, the numerous proposals that lie in parliament for the establishment of a register of lobbyists, once approved must necessarily determine the existence of a specific training course and the technique of legal dispossession is the basis of each lobbying.

Or perhaps the lobbyists' order has problems with the ethical regulation that they cannot solve.



Links[modifica | modifica sorgente]


Legal spoliation (index)

<Index>

  1. interv. Fausto Bertinotti, 708 401 / Constitutional referendum. Bertinotti: the slut will win the yes. But Catholics ..., June 2, 2016. URL consultato il 4 June 2016.
    «And what happened in this time frame? B. For at least a quarter of a century the material constitution, i.e. the set of laws, agreements, contracts that are produced against the formal one, for at least a quarter of a century has gone in the opposite direction to the programmatic constitutional charter .».
  2. Errore Lua in package.lua alla linea 80: module 'Modulo:Citazione/Suggerimenti' not found.
  3. Template:Quota news